new stats tomorrow

i think we wont use net points anymore cause it sux. gives no good results, unless we divide off and def. and we wont divide without a lot of effort.

i will use 2 stats then:
1. stamina dropped. i can extract it from battles_fought with 100% accuracy. this will be main stats. shows activity without showing surge/fight and skill.
2. surge stats. i will divide points won by number of wins for each war separately. then i will make 3 columns - number of surged wars, number of fought wars, number of wars without stamina dropped.

warning will be given to 5 members with lowest stamina dropped, and to another five on the bottom of the list that didnt surge (surge wars count < fight wars count)

I'm doing a bit more fighting than I should to earn some LP back, I hope that doesn't mess with my numbers too much. But it probably will. =(

you got a good excuse, kfsw kicked you (by accident) so you get a "get out of jail for free" card for these stats.

XD Thanks.


Although, my work is really picking up... Based on how my meeting goes with my boss tomorrow I may not have much free time to spend on Tyrant. I will reserve any official decision until after I talk to him tomorrow, but depending on the due date for this project I will either have to drastically change my schedule to get it done in time or I will be free to leave my schedule as is.

I'll make an official post if I do have to leave though, so... Until tomorrow... =/

Ahh I would still love to see the net points so we know how we did

of course they will be posted

If I understand the targeted stats that were described, the investigated results of pure, constant surge spams will be...

1. High stamina dumping
2. 35-45 pts/win, #-0-0 columns
an absolute (#<0)=false

...without any regard to productivity evident to me.

Assuming 45-0|0-10 and 25-0|0-10 play, a 50% surge rate is inferior to a 80% fight rate.

Example:

20-20 surger
900 won
200 against
700 war effect

32-8 fighter
800 won
80 against
720 war effect

In the past, I have favored the route with the most advantage, adjusting along results.

In the present, it appears I am to favor surges over war outcomes. If this is true, I will oblige and override efficiency with detrimental compliance.

Perhaps my past calculative splits were abnormal behavior and normal players don't determine that adjustment during war, causing a void of guidance requiring faction intervention.

'cause I'm a weirdo, no question there.

you are right there, but, "to another five on the bottom of the list that didnt surge"

meant are guys that do bad and don't surge, if you can get a 80 percent fight rate and are active, thats alright, I normally have surge rates over 60% though, but I also change to fight for some wars.

Okay, yep, I think I read it wrong then.

It's all these defensive wars coming from top5 that have my surge decks flopping, even with a Niaq handy I sweat when I see a turn1 GS drop.